|
This book jumps around a lot. There are many references to prostitutes, one night stands, and "love" that is actually lust. Overall, this book wasn't horrible but I don't believe it deserves the raving reviews it got from others.As a female reading this book, I found it a bit difficult to connect with the male mind. It gives tidbits of information that at the time might not seem important but tie into the main story later. So, if you're a bit skiddish of vulgar language and references you'll be sorely disapointed in this book.The whole book is full of catch-22s. For instance, a character named Hungry Joe likes to take pictures of naked women that never develop correctly but when he was a citizen, he had been a professional photographer. Because of this, the book gets more interesting towards the end but seems drawn out and boring at the beginning. All in all, I've read better books but I've also read a whole lot worse.
If you have trouble with the book - get the audio CD narrated by Sanders. But with the help of Sanders who manages to give the various characters distinct voices/intonations, it is so much more enjoyable.
Sanders in Catch-22 Audio CD version is so impressive that I just have to.The book can not be an easy read. I rarely write a review, but the performance of Jay O.
Difficult to follow at times. I don't think I would have gotten trough it.
Some of Heller's chapters/paragraphs are intentionally repetitive although funny. Amazing what a good actor can do.
I had to read several critcal essays and finally buy a professional study guide to get a grip on it. It is unduly complicated, poorly written and it seems the author works to obscure basic issues. I cannot believe that people require high school students to read this.The analogy I would use to describe the book is a painting where a monkey threw paint on a canvas and art critics were shown the painting not knowing that a monkey did it. in Speech and Dramatic Arts, B.A.
Basically people make meaning of the book by struggling to overlay patterns of organization on a chaotic work. in Speech and Dramtic Arts and a MA in Communication Studies. It has taken me three weeks of intense study to figure out what I was reading and watching in the movie. This is the worst piece of literature I have ever read. I think at some point a student has to be able to say that a work is extremely offensive and refuse to read it. Many people are afraid to say that this is a bunch of crap.
They would all sit around and swear that it has meaning and and that it makes significant statements about the state of world affairs. There would be studies and books written about it because they read meaning into the work.
I would not listen to "gangster rap" or read or view Hotel Rwanda for any class. The pattern of the plot is extrememly difficult and almost impossible to summarize.I have a Ph.D.
I can't say enough disparaging words about this book. It seems that the literary critics and teachers have invested a great deal of time writing elaborate analyses of the work.
I think that people believe it to be the work of a genius because it is unintelligble and they think someting grand must be there. I would never, under any circumstances, have my students read it.If I was not required to read and analyze this book for a graduate seminar, if I was in an undergradute class I would just take an F on the assignment.
I am sorry I have been forced to read this imitation of a novel.
Then one of the officers comes up with the brilliant plan to simply promote him and make the entire company forget about the issue. Similar to the way that Catch-22 doubles back on itself, the book's dialogue is loaded with endless double entendres and a unique style of speaking I will call "catch talk." Many of the men, such as Yossarian, Orr, and Natalie all have conversation riddled with sexual innuendo. Yossarian was one of the most original characters I have ever heard of. When his commanding officers become furious with him and they attempt to punish him, Yossarian suggests that in order to avoid making the company look like it has insubordinate members the officers should simply promote him.
But on closer inspection, Yossarian is in fact one of the most sane people in the book. The officers quickly write the idea off as ludicrous and continue trying to find a punishment for him. Soon, however, they realize on their own that punishing Yossarian would look bad for the company. Catch-22 delivers the tragic story of a wide variety of American soldiers during World War II in a way that is both heartbreaking and hilarious. Everyone acts calm while flying, while Yossarian is panicky and wants nothing more than to get the hell out of the fight. This style of speaking catches the readers' attention and creates something unique that the reader can identify about the book.
Playing the protagonist for a good portion of the book, he at times is also the antagonist, as he inhibits the goals of some of the other main characters. Similar to the looped idea of Catch-22, Yossarian can be quickly classified as one of the most insane people in the book (he curses himself for forgetting to bring his machine gun to the officer's club in order to massacre everyone).
With its unique conversations and the one-of-a-kind Yossarian, Catch-22 was a hilarious and tragic adventure that gives a unique perspective on the war. Catch talk most commonly occurs when Yossarian is present.
While all other officers act perfectly sane on the ground, they are considered insane because they ignore their instinct to survive in the air. Thus, catch talk occurs.
One party begins the argument arguing one way, and the talk then deviates to something different, but then reverts back to the original statement. Yossarian, on the other hand, acts insane while groundside but then is perfectly sane in the air.
The doctor agrees that Yossarian is crazy, for a variety of reasons. And you think "Aha, this is a farce". It actually starts at the author's note, which states that the real island of Pianosa lies in the Mediterranean off the Italian coast and is far too small to accommodate all the incidents set there in "Catch-22". As for Yossarian's question, when you find out what happened to Snowden, you learn that Yossarian isn't quite as nuts as you might think. So you start reading, with the idea in mind that the story on paper is, if anything, less real than other books, and the activities of the characters seem to bear you out - for instance, within the first few pages the narrative describes a captain with whom Yossarian has stopped playing chess because the captain is a good chess player, and the games are therefore so interesting they are foolish.
Let's just say that his question has to do with lost innocence also, and let it go at that.As a matter of fact, you can read all of "Catch-22" as a series of confrontations between innocence and whatever seeks to destroy it, another good reason for setting it in wartime. You can also read it as an attack on postwar bureaucracy a la Kafka's "The Trial", or some kind of anti-imperialist manifesto, or I don't know what, but please don't forget that it's also a comedy of manners, however unlikely that sounds. And just to give you an idea of how lightly you can take this book, we know that the phrase "Catch-22" is pretty nearly random. Oops.This is far from the first or last such incidence of utter lunacy in this book.
If he does that, however, the doctor is required to take that as a sign that he has a normal, healthy aversion to being shot at, that he is therefore sane, and that he must therefore fly more combat missions. Yossarian, the protagonist and a World War II bombardier, wants his squadron doctor to certify him insane so his superiors will ground him and he won't have to fly combat missions. Yossarian makes a good central character because he's almost the only one who finds a way to fight the cynics around him without becoming cynical himself. In short, it's a double bind.The first Catch-22 ever publicized is, of course, to be found in this book. The question is a riff on the refrain of a poem by the medieval French poet Villon - "Where are the snows of yesteryear." - the verses of which seem to be about the loss of beauty and love, or maybe innocence. The chaos begins well before the story kicks off.
That's how much heavy significance there is to this novel - first and foremost, it's meant to be funny, and it succeeds exceptionally well.Joseph Heller gave an interview once in which he envisioned Buck Henry, who wrote the movie screenplay, flipping through "Catch-22" in despair and moaning "There's no PLOT here." Technically speaking, that's probably true, but it doesn't matter. Farce, my foot.Joseph Heller had a real gift for the goofy detail - he could have written sketches for Monty Python - and it was a stroke of genius for him to set his first novel during World War II, because the pressures of wartime prevent the story from dissolving into a set of disconnected episodes. By this time everyone knows what a Catch-22 is - we're inundated with them every day - but in case you're not sure, it's a circumstance in which the very thing you need in order to get you what you want is the very thing that will prevent you from getting it. This probably explains why there are so few combat scenes in the novel, and maybe why this is an air unit rather than a ground unit. It allows Heller to tell his story at one remove from genuine blood and death, at least until the novel's climax, and concentrate on the conflict between the innocent and the cynical.
It doesn't work forever, but it keeps Yossarian out of the snake pit long enough to learn another strategy from a most unlikely supporting character, and that's how "Catch-22" manages to end in some sort of triumph.So that's one possible reading of this ridiculous story - ridiculous on its face, that is.
The author came up with a few other strategies to lend his story a framework, most particularly Yossarian's recurring recollection of what happened in his plane to a young gunner named Snowden.
Its structure and theme make this novel hang together more than well enough.
All that's lacking is for Yossarian to ask to be grounded.
As we follow Yossarian from his desire to avoid combat by simply refusing to cooperate (following in the footsteps of his great predecessor, the Good Soldier Svejk), to his desperate attempt at keeping his sanity and his moral compass while tied hand and foot by the last great Catch-22, we come to realize that like a lot of light farces, this one has some pretty deep roots.
Then Chapter 2 starts with the line "Outside, there was still nothing funny going on," and you remember that Yossarian and his buddies are in imminent danger of death every day.
In speaking of this incident, he generally turns it into a bad joke, asking "Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear." during mission briefings whenever someone asks if there are any questions.
Joseph Heller wanted to call it "Catch-18", but his publisher made him change the number to avoid confusion with the contemporary bestseller "Mila 18", and he picked one that sounded euphonious to him.
Evidently the little island of Pianosa, at least in Joseph Heller's imagination, is plenty big enough for a great tale.Benshlomo says, Sometimes goofing off is better than preaching sermons.
|
